@Gollum
.
.
Non sale MENTEUR ! ....... la preuve voici le copier-coller en anglais de l’article de Forbes
.
.
Chop Down Forests To Save The Planet ? Maybe Not As Crazy As It Sounds
.
Bill
Gates and other investors are betting Kodama Systems can reduce carbon
dioxide in the air by chopping down and burying trees. Now if only Uncle
Sam would get on board with tax credits, too.
By
Christopher Helman, Forbes Staff
A
year ago, Merritt Jenkins moved from Boston to Twain Harte, California,
a speck of 2,500 souls in the foothills of the Sierra Nevadas. On his
morning commute, he stops at Alicia’s Sugar Shack for a breakfast
sandwich (scrambled eggs on rye with avocado), then heads to a 10-acre
patch of woods in the Stanislaus National Forest. There, his startup, Kodama Systems, is testing and perfecting its 25-foot-long, 17-ton semiautonomous timber harvesting machine.
.
Loggers use such machines, known as skidders, to grab tons of cut
trees and debris and drag them out of the woods. Kodama’s version is
designed to do the job even at night, with fewer workers, using
satellite connectivity and advanced lidar (light detection and ranging)
cameras, the same type that are used on self-driving cars, to monitor
the work remotely. It isn’t easy. “There’s a lot of texture to the
trees. Every 10 feet of skid trail is slightly different,” says Jenkins,
35.
.
But logging in the dark isn’t the most intriguing part of the plans
at Kodama, which has raised $6.6 million in seed funding from Bill
Gates’ Breakthrough Energy
and others. After cutting down the trees, Jenkins plans to bury them—to
help slow climate change and to reap salable carbon offsets (and maybe,
someday, tax credits too).
.
Yes, the conventional idea is to plant trees to soak up
carbon dioxide from the air and to then sell credits to corporations,
private jet owners and others who need or want to offset their
emissions. But scientists say burying trees can reduce global
warming as well—particularly if those trees would otherwise end up
burning or decaying, spewing their stored carbon into the air.
.
California’s enormous 2020 wildfires drove home the risks to air, property and life posed by overgrown forests. “The orange skies
in San Francisco were an inflection point. Now the story resonates,”
says Jimmy Voorhis, head of biomass utilization and policy at Kodama.
The alarm bells are sounding even louder this year as Canadian wildfires
have spread dangerous air conditions to New York, Washington, D.C., and
Chicago.
.
To help address the problem, the U.S. Forest Service aims to thin out 70 million acres of western forests, mostly in California, over
the next decade, extracting more than 1 billion tons of bone-dry
biomass. It is customary, after such forest thinning, for logs of
marketable size to go to sawmills, with most of the rest piled up and
later burned under controlled conditions. Kodama wants to bury the
leftovers instead—in earthen vaults designed to maintain dry and anoxic (oxygen-free) conditions and protect the wood from rotting or burning.
.
Along with the VC seed money, Kodama has already received $1.1
million in grants from California’s forest fire agency and others, as
well as purchase commitments for the carbon credits tied to the first
400 tons of trees it buries. On the open market, those credits should
fetch $200 a ton. Eventually Kodama wants to cut down and bury more than
5,000 tons of trees a year.
.
A Dartmouth grad with degrees in both engineering and environmental
studies, Jenkins started selling used robotic equipment while earning a
master’s in robotics at Carnegie Mellon. Then he cofounded a company
that uses machine learning to help farmers analyze soil. But in 2019,
while earning an MBA at MIT, he concluded there was more opportunity in
forestry than in the crowded ag-tech field. He backed away from the AI
company and spent months with loggers to understand how
they use equipment, and by 2021 had settled on forestry robotics,
convinced that labor shortages would drive demand. “There’s not enough
workforce,” he says. “We’ll need new training and new technologies” to
meet the Forest Service’s clearing goals.
.
He also saw another “big gap” in the industry : what to do with all
that biomass. He had heard about biomass vaults from Yale’s Carbon
Containment Lab. Then mutual friends introduced him to Voorhis, a
33-year-old mountaineer, geologist and earth sciences engineer (with an
M.S. from Dartmouth), who had become obsessed with the idea of
reclaiming old mines as biomass burial sites. They joined forces.
.
The notion of burying trees sounds simple and low-tech, particularly
when compared with the convoluted “carbon capture” technology now being
developed to pull CO2 from the air. Thanks to the Inflation Reduction
Act Democrats passed in 2022, companies like Occidental Petroleum and
ExxonMobil could qualify for tax credits of $85 per ton of CO2
sequestered if they can perfect systems to suck the gas directly from
the air and transport it by pipeline before injecting it permanently
underground. The IRA further incentivizes some of these projects with
tax credits equal to 30% or more of upfront capital invested.
.
If you want to cut down trees and pelletize them to burn in place of
coal, there are tax credits for that too. But not, as of now, for
burying them.
.
“If you need to remove carbon at scale, it’s crazy not to learn from
nature or harness nature,” says Lucas Joppa, a former chief
environmental officer at Microsoft who is now at Haveli Investments.
“We’ve never come remotely close to being as efficient at removing
carbon from the atmosphere as evolution has.”
.
How efficient ? University of Maryland atmospheric science professor
Ning Zeng, considered the godfather of biomass burial, explains that the
average ton of freshly harvested forest is about 50% carbon by weight,
and if left to rot or burn it would put the equivalent of one ton of
carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. A good rule of thumb, he says : “A
ton of biomass in the Earth is a ton of CO2 not in the sky.”
.
Zeng has his own startup, Carbon Lockdown, which has a contract with
the city of Baltimore to pick up 5,000 tons of biomass and bury it near
wealthy, leafy Potomac, Maryland. He’s selling the carbon credits
generated by that burial at $181 per sequestered ton on Puro.earth (a
platform that was built with backing from the Finnish government and
became majority-owned by Nasdaq in 2021). Swedish investment company
Kinnevik recently bought 1,000 tons. “Nature-based technologies are here
and scalable,” says Mikaela Kramer, who oversees carbon credit
purchases for Kinnevik. “It doesn’t have to wait another 10 years.”
.
Still, it’s tough to get large-scale private or government investment
in biomass burial because it’s neither replacing a climate-destroying
industrial activity nor creating a product that’s of use to people—other
than the credits themselves. It also can mean disturbing land.
.
.
SUITE de l’article sur ce Lien
.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/christopherhelman/2023/07/28/chop-down-forests-to-save-the-planet-maybe-not-as-crazy-as-it-sounds/